03-06-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#63
|
WHAT
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $10019545
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull
First off, Htis, Im not assuming that there will be no cap. All I'm saying is, the current contracts that have been restructured, in addition to that, the current contracts that have been terminated have put us under the current cap(94.5mill). I mean that is the impression I'm getting after reading Merrill's article. She did say, that there woulda been no cuts Sunday regardless. So this has to mean that the Chiefs are under the current cap? right? I can't think of anything else?
So what Im saying, is, if they're under the cap already. Why not keep those contracts the same? If you have a new CBA reached, the new cap number is projected to rise another 10+ million. So why not sign a defensive player or 2?
You have the cap room to work with....this is what Im trying to get at.
|
I am guessing because restructuring contracts for all these vets means more trouble down the road when they are no longer playing at a high level or maybe not even playing at all.
|
Posts: 9,301
|
|