Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CosmicPal
Huh? That doesn't make any sense: Cutler has far more upside....I'll take Croyle.
You want the lesser of the better?
|
Cutler has more upside, that doesn't necessarily mean he'll be better. There's a good chance he could be a complete bust too.
Neither will start next year, which means neither team
needed a QB. Even if they did, Croyle is far more ready to play now than Cutler is.
To me, Cutler is an 8 out of 10 for potential and a 2 out of 10 for risk. Croyle is about a 4 or 5. When you factor in what each team gave up to get them, I'd absolutely take Croyle.