Quote:
|
Originally Posted by htismaqe
Cutler has more upside, that doesn't necessarily mean he'll be better. There's a good chance he could be a complete bust too.
Neither will start next year, which means neither team needed a QB. Even if they did, Croyle is far more ready to play now than Cutler is.
To me, Cutler is an 8 out of 10 for potential and a 2 out of 10 for risk. Croyle is about a 4 or 5. When you factor in what each team gave up to get them, I'd absolutely take Croyle.
|
Good point. But, I like Cutler chances better because Denver has a better history of drafting QB's than KC does.
Despite KC's poor history in drafting QB's, I like Croyle's chances better than any QB we drafted in the past. You have to like a guy who was knocked down on nearly every play, and to get back up and throw as well as he did with poise under pressure. We all know both he and Cutler have the intangilbles, but will they both be able to understand not only the complicated offenses, but the speed of the defenses? Only time will tell.