Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC
I dont drink Drain-o, I stick with Jim Beam, thanks for the offer though.
I agree. Winning the superbowl would never cause a organization to lose money. If you think that you need to back away from the crack pipe.
But do you realize the risk vs reward. I feel that is what Carl looks at. The risk is to great financially to go and make winning a superbowl a goal. I have no doubt that he wants to win the superbowl, but he will have to win it on his terms without the risk of spending or going out on the preverbal limb to get that championship.
Carl looks at the bottom line and the future of the organization's financial state or salary cap. Carl is not going to sell out the Chiefs, for a chance at superbowl immortality...
So we can love him for that or hate him for it, but that is the way it is and probably why his is going to retire a very weatlhy man thanks to all the loyal KC fans.
|
How many recent Super Bowl teams have COMPLETELY mortgaged their future to win one - Tampa? Baltimore?
The idea that there's some kind of huge financial risk in building a Super Bowl team is ridiculous.
Carl ALREADY HAS, many times in the past, gone out on the proverbial limb. He's signed Chester McGlockton, Joe Montana, and on and on and on. The idea that he won't spend money is false.
It's not that he won't spend money, it's that he spends it on the WRONG PEOPLE. From Carlton Gray to Vonnie Holliday, Dexter McCleon to Dan Williams, Carl has willing thrown MILLIONS of dollars at guys that just aren't very good.