Quote:
|
Originally Posted by underEJ
I think the way I read it, the judge was on the kid's side as a question of reason, but was bound by legislation, so accepting the appeal would have been illegal. Representatives appealing to conservatives with reactionary legislation against sex offenders are actually at fault.
And wake up people, many states just got hoodwinked into this crap in the last election under the guise of protecting children.
Like I said before, time for the torch carrying mob on the capital steps.
Edit, this sounds like I disagree with you, but I think we agree on the judge's actions right?
|
Like I said before, the letter of the law. I would think that a judge should be able to exercise some JUDGEment on this. If it is just about strictly following the law we might as well put a computer up there as the judge instead of a thinking (hopefully) human. I don't care what the law is, each case is individual and needs to be treated on such a basis.