Quote:
|
Originally Posted by noa949
I don't think we need to regulate our site to cater to people who can't detect sarcastic exaggeration.
Sure, ask for a link if you want, but to argue that this is related to the discussion of people posting entire articles without links is a stretch IMO.
|
I wasn't serious about banning him. I was against the banning on the original premise. First I just typed "Link," then I remembered we had just discussed something similar, so I added "or b&?."
I do get irritated when people misrepresent the views of others or history over and over [RRPP, Bush said Saddam engineered 9/11, Clinton got impeached for getting a BJ, CP drafted Blackledge [OK, that's a clear in-joke at this point], etc] hoping it'll turn into truth in the zietgiest, but was mostly TIC. HowTF did cross-thread humor turn into so serious a discussion.