First the article says the Chiefs stuck to their guns and picked the best player regardless of position. Then in the second round they don't pick the best player available and select a player of need. What are they trying to say? It doesn't make sense to me.
__________________
Never be satisfied with what you achieve, because it all pales in comparison with what you are capable of doing in the future.
Last edited by chop; 05-02-2007 at 07:00 PM..
|