Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iowanian
Then you'll surely agree it makes no sense to waste the opportunities to find out if Croyle has the tools and mental toughness and decision making to be an NFL starting QB.
none of this changes the fact that Hamas is a bigger dickbag than you, even if lumping in the Huard Dumbf@ckary.
|
My only argument is, we're 1/2 game out of first to the Raiders, who aren't going to win our division...
If Croyle is going to turn the ball over 5 times a game, I rather stick with Huard...
Huard didn't play bad today. Of course everyone on this board is going to place the blame squarely on his shoulders, but that's because of their vendetta against the guy...
The center and the right side of the line were awful, Huard delivered a lot of good passes in the face of pressure SEVERAL times...
The fact of the matter is, we faced a Jags defense that is one of the best defenses in the NFL, and LJ ran for 11 or 12 yards...
How are we going to win games when we can't run the ball? We don't have Manning or Brady, we don't have a QB on our roster that will win us games...not Huard, not Croyle...it's not going to happen...
We need a rushing attack, plain and simple...personally, I'd rather stick with Huard because Croyle is in a lose-lose situation until we find a way to run the ball.