Thread: Are we now the youngest team in football?
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2007, 05:35 PM   #2
CupidStunt CupidStunt is offline
offense > defense
 
CupidStunt's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Casino cash: $-746668
Quote:
Originally Posted by findthedr
yeah, but all the age on the Oline negates all of that.
Pretty much.

I believe we are, 1-60, the youngest. But we need to can the 30-to-35-year-old roster-fillers, which is likely to happen in the offseason. Replace Wiegmann, Welbourn, Dunn, Terry, Turley and Law with a collection of draft picks, younger guys already on board and middling free agents ranging from 25- to 28-years-old and we'll probably be the youngest 1-53 team in the NFL.

Plenty young at WR, RB, QB, DL, LB and S. Just need to freshen up on the OL and at CB. TE has Gonzalez but Wilson, his apparent 'successor', is young.
Posts: 9,017
CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.
     Reply With Quote