Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Valiant
Should have said **** it and pitted MU against KU again in the Orange...
|
That couldn't have taken place without screwing OU.
If a conference is deserving of having 3 teams in the BCS Bowls, it should have.
As I have said in a previous post, there is a possibility that a conference could have an undefeated team win the conference championship and have 2 other teams only have 1 loss. How shafted would the team with the 1 loss feel in that case.
The BCS only works if there are 2 undeated teams from any of the 6 BCS conferences.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GRCOAT
Because there would be 4 to 5 Big 10 teams in the BCS every year.
|
Very seldom is there 4 to 5 really good teams in any of the BCS conferences.
Even this year only OSU was the only team that had a better then average year, and even at that, it is questionable because of the strength of schedule. Granted, that could be said for a lot of the collegiate teams this year. Teams need to be punished for going to the bakery for thier schedules. And yes I know that schedules are made years in advance, but scheduling mid-level teams from the MAC can't be counted on to be good quality competition. Can they?