Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC
So tell me Baby Lee, what does credibility on a sports message board, where everyone has a different opinions, thoughts, and ideas actually mean?
Should a select few so called credible ones start dictating the way people think and post here? IF they dont conform to the way certain people think, then they should be banned?
This isnt WPI, This is Chiefsplanet, the best source of Chiefs news in the country... There isnt another sports page I read but this one. I like the diversity and the freedom of people being able to give their thoughts and opinions...
|
Yeah, that's what I was aiming for. I'm itching for the annointment of overlords.
Credibility is your currency for people taking your musings seriously, nothing more.
You were the one warning of the dire consequences of losing credibility for agreeing with another poster.
All I did was point out how silly that warning looked, like, 30 seconds later when the object of your ministrations called your credibility into question, and your laughed it off as a consequence free enterprise.
I'm not saying it's one or the other, but I'm pretty sure it's a metaphysical impossibility for it to be both.
And certainly there is no connection between the idea of remembering the actions of one's past to judge the merits of present musings and implementing a code of thought process with approved arbitors.