Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo
It's about the public health and the right to choose. In theory a persons personal liberties are universal right up to the point where they negatively impact upon anothers liberty. Smoking in public is an attack on the non-smokers rights and it's an obvious health hazard.
|
But when you remove that option, your remove the right to choose, no?
The imposition of a preference always infringes on someone's "rights."
The crux of the matter really comes down to how "important" the issue is to you personally. If I value an establishment enough I suppose I'll patronize it regardless of conditions. That is a choice.
I'm not taking this issue to you personally, just seems you've done a good job of illustrating the point of choice.