[TEX]

Originally Posted by bowener

To me, that seems to be contradictory. If you do not want to put a system in place to which your players are not well suited for, then why would you put a OC in a philosphy he is not well suited for... or better yet, why would you have a 'philosophy' on offense that your players might not suit?

So, what he is saying it seems, is that if he had Tom Brady and Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Jerry Rice in his prime, a finesse pass blocking OL, and a small quick back like Marshall Faulk, Herm would run it between the tackles all damn game because that is his philosophy? That is ****ing reeruned... god he is ****ing reeruned.

I understand what he is saying, yes. He wants to us to be a big O that can bruise you and run it on you. That is his philosphy, ball control and predicatability. But if that is his philosophy we might as well take the UTEP guys name out of the hat.

Herm will just make him change his pholosophy to match his own...