Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock
I'm not grabbing at anything. I'm just pointing out that no union anywhere is going to "trust management" and approve singling out members and limiting their income, not to the extent that this article is talking about. The union is paid because its members are paid.
|
probably right .... but that just shows how short-sighted many of these so-called unions are these days.
they shouldn't even be called unions imo
during the last CBA the NFL players union wanted a higher % of the total income. So they negotiated and extra 2% of the pie in exchange for taking over the retirement and disability funds for it's own members. Then it promptly starting blaming the Owners for the condition of retirement and disability that IT was in charge of.
right now the veteran are made because rookies are making too much money and getting many veterans CUT. But they don't have the brains to go to slotting so that veterans would get paid more. They will still blame the owners for their own stupidity.
stop blaming the owners and start using their brains