View Single Post
Old 04-22-2008, 11:49 AM   #10
suds79 suds79 is offline
MVP
 
suds79's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocina_Basement View Post
By the way... wouldn't BPA probably be McFadden, since he's probably going to be there based on the latest projections.
Good question. But no we don't and here's why.

I certainly hope the Chiefs are taking this into account when determining the BPA.

IMO, part of evaluating BPA goes into what position they play. Ex: QB is a bigger impact position than say Safety. So if you have a QB and a Safety you rate pretty equal in the quality department, the push goes easily to QB because it's a much bigger impact position.

Now for McFadden. IMO, his BPA raiting (or whatever you call it) slips because RBs have a short life in the NFL and they're easy to find in the mid rounds (ex: Kolby Smith)

So that takes his value down.

Teams have got to take into account the position guys play.
Posts: 5,747
suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.suds79 would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote