View Single Post
Old 09-15-2008, 09:05 AM   #13
booger booger is offline
Don't Tug on Superman's Cape
 
booger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: clear out in the sticks
Casino cash: $-2441450
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCJohnny View Post
Oakland was hardly a threat to make a big play in the passing game. What did you see as our exposed weakness in run defense? And how much is the scheme a factor? The Chiefs D wasn't all that great against the rush last year either, and now we are 30th in the NFL in YPC, 32nd in yards allowed.
Last year our problem was Tank and Turk not playing(most of it coaching descisions, not like this year letting them learn on the go) enough snaps to give Edwards and Boone needed rest. The vets played too man snaps. Plus last year was the same basically at LB with Harris at MLB and key Fox when Donnie was hurt. But the DE rotation was better with Allen and Jimmy Wilkerson along with Hali. This year Turk could have been expected to play the Jimmy W. role but couldn't because we had to start him. He is the second best DE we got. Rotation.

Plus the same old problems as last year. Can't get off the field on 3rd down after too many avg. yd. a play on 1st. And an offense with way too many 3 and outs that leads to the D being on the field too much and wearing down in the second half.

Yesterday was Players over Scheme IMO. Herm this past week in Q/A's tried to keep warning that they could really run the ball. Also to tried and warn against us overlooking(as if we should overlook anyone) them since we played NE so tough.

Turk getting hurt was big. I don't remember Johnston playing at DE even though he was active, i could be wrong though. Our DE's and OLB's got embarrassed big time. Hali I imagine was very excited to be going against backup LT Mario Henderson. Hali has felt the pressure to rush the passer and get sacks. Even had a recent article in the star all about it. So I can see him not focusing on the run under those circumstances even though Film study, coaching, and the situation should have spelled out in the game plan to expect them to try to pound the rock. Basically a rookie QB at Arrowhead.....they now the history......expect them to run.

DJ, i have no idea other than I heard his named called once. I'm sorry to say but if i'm being unbiased and looking at just play and not who the player is Donnie Edwards should be cut if not retire.

Flowers at RCB has been a very good run support cb in college and last week. I didn't focus on him this week. If he did struggle like Carr did it's hard to get mad about a rookie or 2 having a bad game.

Once they got to the second level Fargas, McFadden, and Bush aren't that easy to bring down. Plus Griffith is a good FB and they did adapt the zone block bronco scheme up front.

They watched film and saw our stegth up front was our DT's. So they ran all over us and thrashed our DE's and OLB.

Scheme? I don't know, only coaches get the wide angle whole field shots from the endzone as far as gap control. But even going back to last year misses assignments and gaps have been the problems of big running plays.

So no, i don't see it as a scheme problem.

We have 23 defensive players. Some rookies and youngsters that have to learn. And a few Vets who really don't have their skills they once had.

Our strenth is our secondary even though young and our DT's.
__________________
1 Thessalonians 5:3
“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”

KJV
Posts: 12,961
booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.booger has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.
    Reply With Quote