Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Just because Bradford completes 70% of his passes in an offense where he doesn't have to make tough throws does not mean that he's an accurate quarterback. Being accurate in the NFL is a lot more than just getting it to your man, you have to throw the ball in a window, on a bead, and it cannot deviate. NFL receivers don't get 3 yards of separation from DBs.
I haven't seen him throw a 15 yard out or a 20 yard square-in on a frozen rope when one of his WRs is wearing a DB like a cheap suit. It doesn't mean he can't, but to assume he can because he can play pitch and catch against f***ing Baylor is just flat out reeruned.
Bradford is also nowhere near 220 pounds. That's just ridiculous.
|
Some of those comments convinced me that you have not watched Bradford much. Nothing wrong with assuming that because Oklahoma scores a lot that the QB is only playing pitch and catch..... I will admit I haven't watched much of Sanchez or Stafford so I won't comment on what I think they can or can't do. If the only justification you have of your quick dismissal of Bradford is one game against Baylor, and then calling me reeruned for thinking Bradford is an exceptional Q.B., I am convinced you are just talking to hear yourself speak. Watch his highlight film. Watch the throws. Watch him stand in the pocket and just get nailed after he throws, watch him scan the "D" before and after the snap, watch him throw some touch passes, watch him throw bullets on the run, watch him throw darts to recievers in the middle of the field. Go do some homework and if you are convinced still that Bradford is not a good, solid Q.B. then I will listen to you, if you arent willing to do this first before calling someone reeruned then go back to your little war game with gochiefs and leave reality to others.