Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX
2 to 3 years is probably a pretty good estimate, Mr. bobbything. I suppose it all depends on how well and how quickly our drafts work out. Based on Herm's first draft (2006), it's not looking all that fantastic, to be honest. The best we can hope for from that class is that Pollard and Page will get better (and Hali, I guess). Croyle looks like he's just not able to withstand the punishment that comes during a complete season.
The 2007 draft looks a lot better, by comparison. Tank, Turk, Bowe, Kolby, Taylor, etc. I just don't know how well those guys would fair on other teams.
FAX
|
Here's the thing. A lot of us think there is a specific timeline as to when a team should improve and be a contender. That thinking always can get you into trouble.
The main focus should always be on the progression of your team. It could take 5 years to build a football team or maybe 3? truth is, we don't know. But what we do know is there is no progression going on here. I like the youth movement but all of us know the coaching stinks and I have a feeling that stunts the development and growth of some of our younger players.