Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu
Excellent question, Chiefnj2. It doesn't seem to matter what the Chiefs do. Short of winning a superbowl, bitching about the current approach, whatever it is, is the order of the day.
As for me, I agree that this rebuild should probably have started a year earlier, but I'll wait until I see what's happening in year 2 (2009) before I start getting uptight.
|
Forgive me...but this makes no sense to me. You wanted the rebuild to start a year earlier...presumably because it was obvious it was going to be needed. Yet...you don't see that by waiting another year that we are simply delaying the inevitable firing and re-tooling of our "rebuild"? Surely you can see that the coaching-issues we currently have are more obviously flawed than the age-issues we had two years ago? Even sports pundits admit that the Chiefs' age-issues snuck up on everyone.
I'm just trying to figure out why in the hell you're patient with the incompetence, but you were disappointed with a lack of action on this supposed "rebuild". Makes no sense to me.