Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish
And would that be better or worse for the franchise in the long run?
Honestly, you could argue that in a "do-over" with the exact same coaches this team could easily be 5-10 to 7-8....
8 games by less than 7 points is pretty unpredictable. It lends more criticism than support for the current coaching staff for sure, but the fact that we were "in" so many games is a positive no matter what.
|
Well, it could be better or worse one way or another. Better that they are contending the AFC West with 17 or so new players on the roster, with the roster average age of 24. (Keep in mind, I'm just thinking off of my memory, so it may be off.)
Yet, the flip side, the current record that the Chiefs have ended Carl's reign, and possibly Herm's as well.
So I guess, in a way, it could be two positives, except some people could argue that the possible 8-7 record would have extended Carl and Herm.
And I agree on the "do-over" with the same coaches. I mean, Cleveland is a good example of this. Jacksonville is another (Although they did lose their DC, but the talent was there.) The NFL works in funny ways I guess.