Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
I'm not sure where you're getting all this supposed "hate" for Bradford.
Because people think he's the 3rd prospect behind Sanchez and Stafford?
|
Really? Read through the whole thread, and read through past threads. People highly exaggerate his weaknesses, anyone that says they like him is attacked, people make fun of the way he looks, etc.
The rational discussions on him are few and far between.
Quote:
Almost universally, people have said that he has the physical tools it will take to be successful, but is going to have to learn playing from under center, learning to drop properly, and reading defenses - something the other two have a huge head start on.
If that is what you consider hate, then you have really thin skin.
|
Read above. People on here also claim he has a noodle arm, does bubble screens all day, shit on him for the spread even though OU runs more of a pro-style spread than what Tech or Mizzou runs. The arguments against him are fair on the surface, but the exaggerations are just hysterically ridiculous.
Quote:
|
And regarding Brandt, he thinks Tebow is a late 1st round pick, so forgive me if I'm not fawning over his opinion. And I noticed the Times piece didn't say a word about his question marks.
|
So who's viewpoint would you "fawn" over? Not Kiper or McShay. Mayock? Or would you pull this argument out on anyone who favored Bradford?
Quote:
If you've watched ANY sports programming over the course of the past 48 hours, almost universally, the talking heads have talked about there being a huge learning curve for Bradford because of the system he plays in - something the other two hold a huge advantage over Bradford.
I'm not sure why this is so ****ing complicated for people.
|
Sorry if I don't listen to Herbstreit and Corso for draft analysis.