Thread: Chiefs All kidding aside, #3 pick?
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2009, 03:53 PM   #56
CupidStunt CupidStunt is offline
offense > defense
 
CupidStunt's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Casino cash: $-796668
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefFan View Post
I understand that point completely, were we disagree, is that you are assuming our line needs no help, where as, I see, that ONLY, ALBERT has a long-term future with the team. The rest could use major upgrades and I don't believe Waters will be here for more than a couple of years. I see one spot filled and four that need to be upgraded.
I don't disagree with that at all. I think we need upgrades at C, RG and RT, along with a future prospect for LG -- but none of that has any relevance to the No. 3 pick because ONLY a LT is appropriate there, and we have a damn good (potentially elite) one of those.
Posts: 9,018
CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.CupidStunt is too fat/Omaha.
     Reply With Quote