Quote:
Originally Posted by melbar
If he's a definate top 10. Hell you've been missing the fact that I'm arguing for him IF both QB's are gone. I've laid out 10 positives for the guy 3 times in this thread and the last one is the first response and it was just reaffirming the premise that LB's who dont have sack numbers are useless. OK. Make an argument to prove your point. Why not just go to a full time dime package with some stud CB's? Sure the Colts LB's did nothing till the playoffs but a LB's job isnt just rushing the passer. Most of the rushers arent in the top level of tacklers. so how many tackles makes up for 1 sack? How many int's? FF's? I'd personally love to have a guy who can make an open field tackle or send a guy back to the huddle dreading the next time he gets hit. I think after the QB's Curry would be a nice piece of the Defensive puzzle. You would like a 3rd young CB. So make a reasoned argument for why. Dont just make a blanket statement like "cover LB's arent valuable" and assume that makes it fact. Address the list of attributes I've listed on Curry and why they are invaluable. Or maybe you can just call me stupid and run away. Whatevers easier.
|
Almost every team in the league would love to have Patrick Willis. Dude is a ****ing monster.
But these types of players are lunch pail guys. In the top 5, you want a dynamic playmaker. That's not a guy like Willis.
Based on his history, it's not Curry, either.