View Single Post
Old 02-21-2009, 04:10 PM   #92
Coogs Coogs is offline
In Search of a Life
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Northern Kansas
Casino cash: $-2235651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie View Post
**** you. 85 percent said yesterday they wouldn't be upset if they didn't draft a qb. Posted via Mobile Device
That is not exactly true. The middle option stated "grudgingly". There is no guarantee Stafford or Sanchez is even going to be available at the #3 pick. that is why I went with the grudgingly option.

And I suspect grudgingly around here means a lot more than the 15% you are talking about will not be all fuzzy if we do not come out of this with a QB at the top of the draft.

Me. I would trade up to make sure we got one of the two. And maybe even more so today given the fact that the 0-linemen don't appear to be top 5 worthy.
Posts: 21,905
Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Coogs is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
    Reply With Quote