Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
No, it's pretty ****ing simple.
If you stay at 3, you take Raji. If you get someone to move up for Sanchez, you can take Raji, Brown, or Maclin in the 6-10 range.
You don't spend a first on a LT when you have a LT and you can fill every other position on the line outside of the first round.
How is that so hard to understand?
Remember the Chiefs line of '03-'05?
1st round LT, UD LG, UD C, 3rd Round RG, 4th round RT.
One of the best lines in league history.
|
Again with the condescension... and you guys wonder why you are called names and treated like assholes.... because your behavior warrants it!
Note the bolded part, now note the thread title.
Raji -v- Monroe is a valid argument, but on the merits of the player & his value at #3 & to the team, not on your opinion of a position's value within the draft.
How many of our #1s have we spent on DT?
Raji = Dorsey. Is the need greater?