Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
CAN YOU NOT ****ING READ?
This was about how Dorsey's value diminishes as DT as a result of a scheme change.
Albert's value as a LT does not diminish as a result of a scheme change, so he isn't moved to another position.
This has nothing to do with wether he has value as a RT.
This only has to do with his position not being affected as the result of a scheme change.
But teh fact is, if you insist on talking about moving him to RT, his value does diminish because a RT is not as valuable as a LT.
|
That's because the discussion has been about what we do if we're stuck at #3. Looking at the talent available and the positional needs, Monroe is the BPA who fits a need.
People have argued for Raji, and with sound logic, but it does EXACTLY what you're railing on: makes Dorsey a wasted #5 overall. Maybe he can play DE in a 3-4, maybe not. Chances are he becomes a backup/has no role at all and becomes trade fodder (good luck getting much value there when you consider where we took him).
You HAVE insinuated Albert's value is diminished.... when you talk about how RT is not as valuable. I disagree with that assessment! Our OL is in SERIOUS need at RT. If we are stuck at #3, cannot trade out, and don't wish to waste Dorsey, it is not inconceivable we draft Monroe and move Albert.
If we can trade down, all bets are off. Forget Monroe... the dude will be gone anyway, and we have many more needs. We can pick up a RT in later rounds.