View Single Post
Old 03-03-2009, 08:25 AM   #9
SenselessChiefsFan SenselessChiefsFan is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10005450
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins View Post
Glad to know we could have had Stafford instead of Brad Johnson with the Vikings.
#1) I don't think Stafford will be available. So, I dont' think the Chiefs could have had Stafford.

#2) The Chiefs certainly could not have taken Stafford with the 34th pick.

#3) The Chiefs would have had to give up at least a late round pick to get Vrabel.

#4) Finally, I liked Stafford. I think he is the cream of the crop and that is the only QB that I would have liked to see at #3. With THAT said, time will tell how good the guy is. Maybe he is the next John Elway, which is who he reminds me of, and who I think he will compare to. Or, maybe he is the next Ryan Leaf.

Either way, the Chiefs have two solid players for the 34th pick AND they can still take a stud at #3, OR trade down and acquire more picks.

Oh, and I think the only way they get Stafford is to trade up, but I could be wrong.
Posts: 5,540
SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
    Reply With Quote