View Single Post
Old 03-07-2009, 01:43 PM   #114
SenselessChiefsFan SenselessChiefsFan is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10005450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter View Post
I'm a bit in this camp as well.

Many times, as SCF points out, the 3-4 becomes a 5-2/5-3 (OLBs are playing on the Line with little or no pass coverage responsibility). When Pollard is playing in the box, that effectively gives us 3 LBs anyway.

The concern I have is that although our young corners are good, will they be effective in more man-to-man and press coverage. In addition to the NT and Rushbacker we seem to lack....we probably need a tough press corner too.

I could see us using the 3-4 some this year, particularly on first and second down. However, in clear passing situations....we'll be going with a traditional nickle or dime package more often than not. Thus, until we get those three positions filled with solid guys, I suspect at best....we'll be running a hybrid.

We are just too far away from being able to field a real 3-4 to be able to run it very successfully this year.

In pure passing situations, I think the 3-4 is more important because the Chiefs don't have enough good rushing traditional DE's.

I think they will bring the safety and ILB blitz a good bit this year. I don't really want Crennel, because I think his 3-4 is a bit too passive for my taste. But, then again, what do I know?
Posts: 5,540
SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
    Reply With Quote