Quote:
Originally Posted by T-post Tom
It has nothing to do with an "inferiority complex." (And what do you care? Shouldn't you be hanging out somewhere on Hotel Street this time of day/evening?)
As I said before, the Chiefs were only "Texans" for 3 years. They've been the "Kansas City Chiefs" for over 40. The Chiefs were in the AFL longer than the Texans. The emblem is just a dumb idea.
Now if this whole thing was to honor the ORIGINS of the Chiefs, then you'd have an argument. BUT IT'S NOT: It's to honor the AFL. By doing this, you're telling the city and state that has supported the franchise for these many decades that the ONLY choice for a throwback uni includes a hemet emblem of another state that accounts for a tiny percentage of the franchise's history. I don't get that. We're not talking about the Tennessee Titans and Houston here. Come on now.
Hey, I'm not writing my congressman and I'm more concerned about the Chiefs winning a playoff game. Bit it's the thread topic and I think it's a stupid idea. That's all.
|
They were the Texans in 1960, not the Chiefs. How ****ing hard is that to understand? People are making a huge deal over basically nothing.
Now if they were keeping the Texas helmets for good, it'd be a big deal. So for 3 games they'll be known as the Kansas City Texas. Who the **** cares?