Thread: OK lets see it
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2009, 02:08 PM   #9
philfree philfree is offline
Indian Twitter
 
philfree's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Free Agency
Casino cash: $-2293802
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 View Post
No, Phil - it doesn't apply to me.

I'm not the one spouting off all over this board that the Chiefs HAVE to take a particular player.

I'm also not the one that is incapable of watching games and forming my own opinion.

Everyone wants to turn this into Curry v. Sanchez, when in all reality, the Curry backers are the only folks who see it this way.

To them, it's Curry or nothing.

To the Sanchez backers, they'll be thrilled if we take him, but will also accept other players. Curry just doesn't happen to be one of those players, and it chaps the ass of you guys that think Curry walks on ****ing water.
Obviuosly you haven't comprehended everything I've posted on the subject. I have no problem taking Curry or Sanchez or any other player who is worth our pick but the arguments against Curry are not very sound IMO so I've refuted them. Got it?

PhilFree
__________________
[/SIGPIC]
Posts: 16,176
philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.philfree has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.
    Reply With Quote