Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
The arguments against Curry aren't sound?
You mean THESE arguments?
There has been ONE MLB/ILB taken in the Top 3 in the past TWENTY years, and he was a monumental bust?
There is no value at the #3 slot for a LB that would have to learn how to rush the passer?
He won't have the impact of a player like Patrick Willis, who was taken 11th overall in a bad class, Brian Urlacher who was taken 9th in a bad class, or Ray Lewis who was taken 26th, the 4th LB taken in his class?
MLB is one ofthe least important positions on the front 7?
Should I go on?
|
Those things have nothing to do with the players available in the 2009 draft. We can only pick from the players available and the ones who play the positions of greater value aren't that good. Except Stafford, Sanchez and a couple OTs. And you don't know what impact Curry will have period so that line of argumentation is just a bunch of BS. And there's no value at #3 for Curry? LOL There's a whole lot of people who make their living working the draft who think other wise.
PhilFree
