Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
Perfect examples of one of the biggest issues on this board.
Mocks have Curry rated Top 5, therefore he MUST be a Top 5 talent.
It's hilarious that the guys that actually WATCH games and form their OWN opinions get bashed around this place for not agreeing with what Mel Kiper Jr (Mike Williams, anyone) or Mike Mayock says.
Hell, a month ago, Mayock was saying Sanchez shouldn't have come out. Now he's saying that the Broncos better do everything in their power to move up far enough to take him.
I think it's hilarious when people say things like "many here say he's not worth the three pick and they wouldn't touch him with a 10' pole so they want to reach a little farther down the draft board."
NONE of us know what Pioli's draft board looks like.
Therefore, some of us choose to create our own boards, and present our opinions based on that board.
Only at CP are you criticized for forming your own opinion, instead of just being a follower of a guy with helmet hair that is wrong more than he's right, but because he's on ESPN, he must be a ****ing genius.
|
Its not just Kiper...Its EVERY professional talent evaluator. The reason the fact that 99% of drafts have him going in the top 5 is brought up is that it supports the argument that he is a top talent in the draft obviously worthy of the pick. Your arguments against him put YOU in the minority. Thats cool, but talking to people like they're clueless or uninformed because they disagree with you doesnt make you some enlightened guru and everyone else a bunch of followers. It just means our oppinion is in the majority. I see louder criticisims coming from your court than ours.