Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
Why? What if you could get a late 1st for Cassel? That might be one of the best moves in the history of the Chiefs.
See the thing is that Cassel isn't proven, despite how people want to act like he is. If the Chiefs flip him for a better pick than they gave up, that's an AWESOME move, plain and simple.
|
Are you serious? Seriously. You'd really rather have Sanchez (because if Detroit doesn't take Stafford, they should just send in the B2's and carpet bomb the whole city) over Cassel? An unproven (truly unproven) one year starter in college whose had minor leg injuries over a 6'5", 235 lb. athletic guy who just went 11-5 in his first season as a starter in the NFL and who has mentored under the one of the best quarterbacks ever?
This is were I have a problem with drafting Sanchez. He's not the same guy that Cassel is, and I don't see him ever going beyond what Cassel already is. I mean, if the Chiefs didn't trade for Cassel, and they didn't draft Sanchez, I'd be driving I-70 with a car full of matches and gasoline and burn Arrowhead to the ****in' ground. But it just doesn't make sense now that we have Cassel. No sense whatsoever. And the "hold the draft hostage" bullshit is inane blather at best. And holding out hope that they haven't given Cassel a long term because they are only planning to play him one year or trade him for picks and that they draft Sanchez rather than keep Cassel is the very definition of reeruned.