Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
We were talking about Curry and LB's. Not offensive linemen. Don't try to change the subject again.
I've said I'd take Crabtree ahead of Curry.
Furthermore, you and alot of the other Curry advocates continuously want to remove QB from the discussion, as if that's either fair or relevant and it's neither. I'd absolutely take Sanchez over Curry.
As for my stance on Curry being ridiculous, that's easy to say when you're willing to throw the entirety of modern NFL draft history out the window. Talk about ridiculous.
|
1.) I'm not changing the subject at all. You've made the same statements about not taking OL as about not taking Curry at #3.
2.) And, AGAIN, I'm not a Curry advocate. I pointed out that I'd look to Raji at #3 before anyone else. Seriously, if you're not going to bother reading, what's the point of this?
3.) It's not throwing the entirety of modern NFL draft history out the window, as you well know.
4.) Of course I'm removing QB from the discussion. If Pioli takes a QB at #3, that would be far more groundbreaking than taking Curry there, unless you can remember a time that a team has ever drafted a QB in round 1 after trading for a franchise tagged QB. I believe that, if it happens, it'll be a first, unlike a LB being drafted in the top 5.