Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha
Reaper, I heard what he said and he came right out and said that he won't compare Jackson to Seymour for a variety of reasons. However, let's think about this for a second...he's not going to take a guy like Jackson at #3 if he doesn't think that he could become as good as Seymour did in time. Right? It just makes sense.
|
I'd like to think that he wouldn't. But after this draft's purposeful ignorance of draft value, I don't see why he would take value into consideration at #3 but not anywhere else.
I think Tyson is going to be a good player in the scheme and a key cog for the Chiefs defense... but I see him as a Ty Warren-type, not a Richard Seymour-type. I would spend the #3 overall (in the 2009 draft) for Seymour, but not for Warren.