Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16
You were responding to me. I was supporting Dane. Dane was arguing against the assertion that Demitroff is a "Parcells guy." The part in quotes is the only part that Dane was arguing against. I think that Dane showed why Dimitroff isn't a "Parcells guy."
So when you say that there is nothing semantical about it you are patently false. Its purely semantical.
|
Not at all, because the "semantical" part is outside of the question between Mecca and THISmage. It's just Dane being wrong, yet again, in the context of the discussion parameters set up by Mecca himself. You're the one who called it pwnage when it was nothing of the sort.