Quote:
Originally Posted by kcbubb
I could care less if it were Bill Parcells or Bill B. I'll question whoever on a message board. That's what they are for. I enjoy arguing with guys like you that are as hard headed as me.
Although, I will say it is rare that I argue with someone that has such a personal crush and defends everything someone does when they are criticized.
But hey, if Pioli & Haley wins some games with these old farts and makes us even somewhat competitive, I'll be the first to say that I screwed that prediction up.
|
Just for you, some questions:
1.) Why not more veteran running backs to compete?
2.) What's the backup plan if Thomas gets another concussion?
3.) Why is Cassel not signed to a long-term deal and, if the Chiefs plan to hold off, why not go public with an explanation?
4.) Does he think Dorsey is a bust? If he does, why didn't he trade him prior to the draft, when he could have used the 4-3/3-4 thing as cover? If he doesn't, but he's not using Dorsey on the nose, why did he draft 2 defensive ends?
5.) Why not look to bring in a #2 receiver if he was going to get rid of Gonzalez? Is that going to wait until cuts, is he confident in what's already there, did he not like what was available... why?
See, these are questions that I'd ask if I could sit down with him over a beer. They are not, however, complaints, because it's far too early to be going down that path.
I don't defend everything. I say wait and see. There's a big difference. Frankly, there's always plenty to question, no matter who the person is. I question Belichick,and he's the best in the game. However, and again, there's a difference between having questions, and making asinine comments preferring Herm's approach over Pioli's when you haven't even seen this team on the field for the first time under Pioli yet.