Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
Yeah, but listen to the ridiculousness of your accusation.
"Most of these guys, because of Herman ****ing Edwards failure as the coach of the Kansas City Chiefs will now be put in a better position to succeed when they are either traded or released."
You're saying that Herm Edwards did a poor job of building a foundation... because he wasn't able to develop players for a 3-4? Listen to yourself. You don't think that claim is slightly ridiculous? I agree that the shift to the 3-4 makes it less likely that some of these bright young players will develop into quality player... as Chiefs. But most of your argument suggests that Herm left this team an absolute mess without regard to the idea that if a new GM chose to stick with a 4-3, this team wouldn't be in nearly as big of a mess.
Again, I'm in full support of a 3-4. But the decision to switch to an entirely different defense shouldn't reflect on Herm's ability to evaluate talent.
|
The argument you are making is that Herman ****ing Edwards built a foundation for this team, that this team
is in better shape because of Herman ****ing Edwards draft.
You didn't qualify that argument by saying that this team theoretically would have been in better shape because off Herman ****ing Edwards drafts if Clark Hunt had hired a different GM, who in turn would have hired a different HC who was commited to the 43 defense.
My argument is based on the assertion without the qaulification, because I can only argue the points you make, not the thoughts you failed to write.
But your argument is still nonsequitur, because at the end of the day, this team is still worse when Herman ****ing Edwards left than what it was when he took over, and there are only ab out 3-4 players from his drafts that will be a part of the foundation of the team that Pioli-Haley are going to build.