Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Highly debatable.
|
No, it's not. If you actually think that Goff, Niswanger and ScIntosh would each start for an NFL franchise, you need to watch some film.
JFC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
I think Charles proved something last year. The fact you discount him completely is quite a stretch.
|
Yeah, he proved he had hamstring injuries and could only run the ball 67 times.
It's all about
what you've done, not about
potential.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Uh, are you going to tell me Bobby Engram has proven NOTHING?
|
He's proven that he's 36 and may not make the team. To think that a 36 year-old receiver is going to make an impact is tenuous at best.
Who was the last 36 year old receiver in the NFL to make an impact?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Oh please. It's not that bad. Magee, Jackson, Thomas, Vrabel - all upgrades.
|
Pure and utter speculation. First off, they're transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4, so there's no comparison to last year.
Secondly,
and more importantly, you've just mentioned not one, but TWO ****ing rookies and two guys with more than 13 years in the league are going to make an
impact.
Really? ****ing really?
We'll all be lucky if three of those four are even
standing by December. Zach Thomas is a 100 years old and neither Tyson Jackson or Alex Magee have played 16 games before (not to mention, the 4 pre-season games).
JFC, Clay. I'm really disappointed.
You're certainly not acting like an impartial journalist.