View Single Post
Old 08-18-2009, 10:48 AM   #151
SenselessChiefsFan SenselessChiefsFan is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10005450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 View Post
There may have been no need to switch the scheme if you kept Allen and had a DL of Hali/Tyler/Dorsey/Allen.

Saying the Chiefs got Albert for Allen isn't the complete picture because KC still needs to replace Allen and find a pass rusher.
If the Chiefs had not traded Allen, the Chiefs would not have drafted Dorsey. I would have been fine with that, they may have traded down... which would have been great.

But, if not, they would have taken Albert at #5.

I think that they would have wanted to go to a 3-4 regardless.

I know he had a good year last year, but you look at the talent beside him and I think he actually took a step back from where he was in 2006.

At the time, I didn't want the Chiefs to sign him.

I didn't want the Chiefs to sign LJ either. I think they were both high risk players.

Time will tell, but I still think this is the best for the Chiefs..especially given the new scheme.

Oh, and if the #5 draft pick last year wasn't enough to keep the scheme the same, I don't know that JA would have prevented it either.
Posts: 5,540
SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.SenselessChiefsFan must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
    Reply With Quote