Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix
I'd like to see his stats, but that's about my impression too. I'd change "mediocre" to "slightly above average" and I agree.
|
This is where stats get interesting with guys like George...
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...G/GeorEd00.htm
There are a TON of great players with great stats, do they all deserve consideration? I dunno. George was definitely above average and one of the best at his position, but there were a lot of great RBs in his era.
I view George as the Rod Smith of RBs during his era... but without the rings. Don't get me wrong, I think Rod deserves consideration... but, there's a lot of guys with great numbers during that era.