Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367
IIRC most of the QBs who tend to be flash-in-the-pans are the Volek types who have a good game or two. As you said, though, one good year is a different story. I think Cassel showed enough last season to be considered for real.
And what would have been a better choice? While I'm new here, it seems like you guys had a debate here about Sanchez. Personally, I can't see throwing huge money at a rookie QB who might turn out to be a bust. Their deals are almost identical (Cassel's is one year longer and ends up being $500k more per year) but at least Cassel showed some poise in actual NFL games.
|
I know,I'm scared to throw that kind of money at a rookie too,but I'm just not ready to sacrifice my children at the alter of Cassel yet.:
