09-20-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#4
|
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beaverton, OR
Casino cash: $10006847
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
I love how the narrative of what actually happened in the game changes after the game is over. Go back and read the first half of the game thread. This is what you'll see:
"Holy shit, I can't believe the Raiders are this ****ing stupid"
"Cable is the best D-coordinator we've ever had"
"The Raiders keep stopping themselves with bad play calling"
Were we better against the run today? Hell yes. But let's not start sucking each other's dicks. This is a bad run defense, and we "stopped" it about as well as the Patriots stopped Marshall Faulk in the Super Bowl. When your coaches don't come out to establish what you do well, it's not the other team that has stopped that part from working, it's those coaches.
The truly amazing thing is that Russell was so bad, and so inaccurate, that he wasn't even able to hit swing and flare passes. Had he even done that, you probably would have (but not definitely) seen a lot more running, as the lanes were wide open and it would have extended the drives.
|
  Now we are supposed to judge how well the Chiefs did based on what someone posted on a "game thread". JFC
|
Posts: 2,486
|
|