Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
We gave a long list. I think where we're on a different page is that I think for the offensive line, we should have been okay with stopgaps.
We're not talking long-term solutions here. I agree that with the available options, we probably would have gotten one at the most (if any). But there were plenty of short-term solutions out there. And given the importance of developing and protecting your QB that you traded for, it should have been a priority to at least make us as good at every line position as possible.
The lists every one has brought up consists of cheap, short-term fixes, all of which were better than our current options. None of them would have turned our offensive line around, but all of them would have made it better.
|
Chiefzilla,
I'm not arguing with you. You provided me a list and I completely agree, some of them would have been an improvement.
It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.
I've also seen a few names brought up in other threads, and the same people who're bringing up their names now were the SAME people who were screaming that they were a waste of money, too old, not the right mix, etc. a few months ago.
So which is it? Should I believe them now or should I have believed them in May/June?