Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
Well for me personally, I haven't read anything that disproves what he's written, whether in print or on the football field. LJ's "ego" response yesterday IMO goes a long way in reinforcing what Whitlock has written.
|
I don't know how to interpret what LJ said yesterday. Was he talking about the Giants or the Chiefs? Was he talking about the players or the coaches? Since most of the "ego" stuff from Whitlock has been about Pioli, then was that some kind of out of the blue comment from LJ about Pioli? Hell if I know. I don't have a horse in this race, so I'm not going to see it one way or the other. It was just a vague comment to me.
As for Whitlock, it's not a matter of disproving what he's written, it's a matter of
proving what he's written. Because I haven't seen anybody else talk about it.
Quote:
|
I guess living 2,000 miles from Kansas City and Jason Whitlock leaves me less opinionated about him as a person and a personality than those living within 50 miles of the city.
|
I don't know Jason, so I don't really have an opinion on him as a person or as a personality. I don't judge people based on the job that they do or the face they choose to present to the world.
I just want "sources" instead of "source". That's all. So far we have Whitlock. And maybe Tim Grunhard, but he (much like Whitlock) sounds like somebody who'd been given the VIP treatment for years who's now upset because he's not being treated like he's some special paragon of the media.
Like I've said, I don't think this is about anybody's ego at Arrowhead, I think this is about the way the team handles the media now. Looks like Jason doesn't like it. But instead of just saying that, he's trying to be more controversial. 'cause, well, that's his job.
Just how I see it.