Quote:
Originally Posted by orange
Why is it baseless?
"Not a helmet to helmet hit" is the only detail Teicher mentions. Why is it baseless to conclude that's what the inquiry was about?
|
It's baseless because you have no idea if the letter from the NFL was clarifying the language or simply saying the call was wrong period, and should not have been made. You're saying words like "probably" based on nothing. Therefore it's baseless.