Thread: Football Whitlock has a great idea
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2009, 02:20 PM   #10
SDChiefs SDChiefs is offline
Veteran
 
SDChiefs's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Americas Finest City
Casino cash: $7990778
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange View Post
Because the NFL rulebook says I'm right.


Rule Change No. 3: Unnecessary roughness has been expanded to include shots to a defenseless receiver's head.
The amendment states, a penalty will be called "If the initial force of the contact by a defender's helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of a defenseless receiver who is catching or attempting to catch a pass."


http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/archiv...ate=03-31-2009
It clearly states that it was not to the head or neck area. It was to the CHEST. Therefore, they were wrong. They sent a letter admitting to the fact they they made a mistake in their calling of the game. Its as simple as that. Maybe they didn't appologize for it. But they did admit to making a bad call.
Posts: 2,321
SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.SDChiefs would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote