Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania
That's just too simplistic... you act as if it's just impossible for the Colts and Saints' records to inflate that %.
|
No, I haven't. As a matter of fact:
Quote:
You want to take out the 4 teams under 6 wins from last year? That should help your argument. I mean, those bad teams are making it look like you played a soft schedule.
Done. .572 in 2008
To be fair, we have to take out the 4 worst records of 2009.
Damn. .606 in 2009
Let's try to help you again.
Since they faced 3 teams with 10 wins or more last year, and will again this year, let's take out and see what happnes, since those pesky undefeated teams are skewing the stats.
2008: .423
Damn. 2009: .429
|
I tried to help your argument by taking out the bottom feeders each year and focusing on the others. That didn't work. .606 > .572
I tried to help your argument by taking out the top teams, since you think that the Colts and Saints have skewed the numbers. That didn't work. .429 > .423
And this whole premise of "skewing" the numbers is ridiculous.
Nothing gets skewed. They play who they play.
I'm not the one saying anything is skewed. I've broken it down to remove any possible bias. You say the Colts and Saints are skewing the numbers?
I removed them, and the numbers are still on my side.
They played too many bottom feeders last year?
I removed them, and the numbers are still on my side.