View Single Post
Old 01-02-2010, 06:14 PM   #305
keg in kc keg in kc is offline
oxymoron
 
keg in kc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
Roethlisberger was drafted right where he should have been, if not higher. Major talent, minor school. So no, I wouldn't have taken him at 3 based on what I knew at the time.

Rivers is a different story.

Sanchez started one year at USC and was coming out as a Junior. That's not the pedigree for a top-5 pick in my book. He should've stayed in school another year. And I think his performance in New York reflects that. He just didn't have the foundation of a successful rookie starter like Ryan or Flacco. I think he's somebody that should have gone in the 20s, if not later, and in a stronger QB class, or a stronger draft, he certainly would have. He's like Aaron Curry in that regard.

Clausen is a risk I might take. A pro style quarterback with three years as a starter in a major program (which is the reason I don't think he's there at 3). Bradford, on the other hand, is not. Spread QB injured for a whole year? Not touching that.

Either way, I think it'll be a great day when you finally get away from this idea that everybody who disagrees with you is some kind of brain-dead idiot who doesn't have any concrete reasoning behind what they think. People have different opinions, that's okay and it's not any kind of slam against you.
Posts: 58,682
keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote