Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good
Im not gonna read this whole thing. but im going to gloss over it as its gonna be the same old, same old argument...
By picking Okung we squander another chance to pick up a top of the line playmaker. Those chances dont come around every ****ing year and despite the recent picks the chiefs have had, unless we totally skull **** our picks (somewhat like last year  ) we are not going to be picking this high again soon.
u dont take Okung because its a need (btw i dont believe it is, cause i think Albert will be fine), u take the value pick e.g. Berry, Clausen. Thus getting a true playmaker. After all its a playmakers league.
Ur argument is basically saying "Lets draft John Tait, when we have a chance to have a franchise qb or an Ed Reed type saftey..."
It most certainly screws over the chiefs cause u dont get that many chances to pick this high. So when u do ud better get value and add a top of the line talent. If ur always going to take the safe option (McClain, Okung, Jackson) ull end up with a mediocre team without enough talent to make any noise in the playoffs. Essentially its the 2003 chiefs again. |
and yet it's still just one draft pick
if that pick turns out to be a quality player it doesn't really matter what position they play and it will hardly wreck the franchise for years.